2008 Patent Cases « Copywrite

Disclaimer

Attorney Advertising. This blog is ATTORNEY ADVERTISING in those jurisdictions in which I am admitted to practice. It is not legal advice. If it were legal advice, it would be followed by a bill.

No Attorney Client Relationship. I provide this blog for general informational purposes only. I am an attorney and some of the information on this blog relates to legal topics, but no attorney client relationship is created when you use this blog. By using the blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and Keith Henning.

Not Legal Advice. The information contained in this site is for entertainment purposes only; it is not intended to constitute legal advice. The information on this blog is general only and limited to the instances discussed. I do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, adequacy or timeliness of the information contained in this site, and users of information from this site do so at their own risk. This blog is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state.

Email is Not Notice. . Email May Not Be Used to Provide Notice. Communications made through the blog's messaging system or email does not constitute legal notice.

Tafas v. Dudas: USPTO Exceded Its Rulemaking Authority with Proposed Limitations on Continuations

Posted on 04/1/2008 by Keith

All of my email lists are abuzz over the ruling in Tafas v. Dudas, which Patently-O covers much better than I ever could:
Patent Law Blog Patently-O: Tafas v. Dudas: PTOs Proposed Limitations on Continuations and Claims are Invalid
In a twenty-six page opinion, District Court Judge Cacheris has granted GSK’s and Tafas’s Motions for Summary Judgment [...]

Filed under: 2008 Patent Cases, Patents | Leave a Comment »