Altnet v. StreamCast, filed for infringement of patents on file hash

Disclaimer

Attorney Advertising. This blog is ATTORNEY ADVERTISING in those jurisdictions in which I am admitted to practice. It is not legal advice. If it were legal advice, it would be followed by a bill.

No Attorney Client Relationship. I provide this blog for general informational purposes only. I am an attorney and some of the information on this blog relates to legal topics, but no attorney client relationship is created when you use this blog. By using the blog, you agree that the information on this blog does not constitute legal or other professional advice and no attorney-client or other relationship is created between you and Keith Henning.

Not Legal Advice. The information contained in this site is for entertainment purposes only; it is not intended to constitute legal advice. The information on this blog is general only and limited to the instances discussed. I do not warrant or guarantee the accuracy, completeness, adequacy or timeliness of the information contained in this site, and users of information from this site do so at their own risk. This blog is not a substitute for obtaining legal advice from a qualified attorney licensed in your state.

Email is Not Notice. . Email May Not Be Used to Provide Notice. Communications made through the blog's messaging system or email does not constitute legal notice.

Altnet v. StreamCast, filed for infringement of patents on file hash

Posted on 08/15/2006 by Keith Henning

Altnet sues Streamcast for patent infringement on its file hash patents. Altnet and other plaintiffs allege that StreamCast and its CEO, Michael Weiss, intentionally infringe Altnet’s “TrueNames” patents as part of its music and movie file distribution business. The patents infringed are 5,978,791 - 6,415,280 - 6,928,442. These guys go back to the days when Kazaa/Sharmon Nerworks, Streamcast split and only acrimony remains.